Organized from day one. Defensible by design.
From thousands of pages to one defensible opinion.
What the expert sees.
Organized from day one.
Case files, transcripts, photos and lab reports land on one timeline, in the order things happened.
It cites the page, or it says it is not in the record.
Every finding points to the exhibit and the page it came from, so a reviewer can check it in seconds.
Your hypotheses and the ones against you, side by side.
Where witnesses and sources disagree, the testimony map shows it, so your opinion is tested before the other side tests it.
“I was able to quickly and precisely organize thousands of pages of deposition transcripts, property management records, and engineering standards … The AI not only organized and retrieved the data; it acted as an analytical partner.”
Built for your corner of the field.
Fire and explosion investigation
Scene photos, statements and the NFPA 921 edition you work to, cited to the page.
Building forensics
Drawings, inspections and the code editions in play, each answer naming its edition.
Cause-and-origin reports
The basis for each section, ruled-out hypotheses included, with the page attached.
Prior engagements and testimony
Past reports and testimony beside the current matter, checked against the record.
Start with the public investigation record.
Public-record collections compiled from agency publications. Not affiliated with or endorsed by CSB, NIST or NTSB.
Built to survive Daubert and Frye.
The basis is disclosed
Only the case documents you loaded reach an answer, each cited to the page.
Every hypothesis, side by side
The evidence for and against each one. It does not pick, and it does not write your report.
The file is still there in three years
Documents, timeline, citations and ruled-out hypotheses stay with the case.
Straight answers.
Opposing counsel will ask what tool we used.
Good. That is the case for a governed system rather than against it. You can describe an approved set of case documents and a citation to the page on every answer. You cannot describe a chat window.
Does it write the report?
No. It exports a cited chronology and an exhibit list as a Word document, written from cited events and nothing else. Report drafting support is on the roadmap: a first draft of the sections the record supports, for you to write from, never a finished opinion. The writing, and the opinion, stay yours.
What stops it from inventing a citation?
It answers only from the documents in the case, and every answer names the source and the page so you can open it yourself. When the answer is not in your file, it tells you so. It will not invent one.
We work under protective orders. What happens to the documents?
Your files stay in your isolated tenant, are never used to train public AI models, and are never shared with other customers. The platform carries SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, mirrors the permissions your firm already sets, and material can be exported or deleted. Bring your counsel’s order to the walkthrough and we will answer against its actual wording.
Does it determine cause and origin?
No. It finds what your file says about the scene, the prior cause-and-origin work where your firm addressed a comparable scenario, and the evidence behind each hypothesis, all cited to the page. The determination is the investigator’s.
What sections does a cause-and-origin report usually contain?
Most firms work from the same spine: assignment and scope, methodology, scene documentation, the evidence examined, the hypotheses considered including the ones ruled out, the opinion and its basis, and the materials relied upon. The workbench does not write it. It finds the material in your file that each section rests on, cited to the page.
More thorough. More consistent. More defensible.
Bring a closed case. We load the files and walk you through the timeline, the testimony map and the cited answers, so you can check them against what you already know.